There is a lot of talk about talent shortages in renewable energy. Yes, the market is tight, but that is only part of the story.
A lot of the cost is not coming from a lack of talent. It is coming from how companies are hiring.
To put that into perspective: delays, missed milestones, budget overruns, team disruption. These are not just operational issues. They are hiring issues.
Hiring often starts when there is already a problem. A project is under pressure, a deadline is slipping, a gap has appeared. At that point, options are limited and decisions are rushed. The cost is not just the hire. It is also the delay that led up to it.
Technical skills are easier to assess so they often become the focus. But what happens when that person cannot operate in a complex project environment? When they struggle with stakeholders? When they slow the wider team down?
Those hidden cost shows up later.
Good candidates do not stay available. They are having multiple conversations. Moving quickly. Making decisions.
When hiring processes drag, companies lose strong candidates and are left choosing from what remains. That has a long term impact on performance.
The market has shifted but not everyone has adjusted. Outdated salary benchmarks and unclear value propositions are pushing candidates away. Not always loudly. Sometimes they just disengage. The cost of replacing that lost opportunity is significant.
This is the biggest one.
Hiring is still seen as a response to demand, rather than a driver of growth. Without workforce planning, talent pipelines and clear strategy, companies end up in a constant cycle of catching up.
Hiring is not just about filling roles. It impacts delivery, performance, revenue, growth.
The companies that recognise this are the ones pulling ahead. The rest are paying for it, often without realising where the cost is coming from.
